Ahem...
Feel free to comment or send me messages in any language you can see in this blog. It's okay if your language of choice doesn't match the given entry's language. You're also welcome to request for translation, within reasonable limits.
Można komentować i wysyłać mi wiadomości w każdym języku jaki widać na tym blogu. Nie szkodzi, jeśli Twój wybrany język nie zgadza się z językiem danej notki. Można też prosić o przekład, w rozsądnych granicach.
Można komentować i wysyłać mi wiadomości w każdym języku jaki widać na tym blogu. Nie szkodzi, jeśli Twój wybrany język nie zgadza się z językiem danej notki. Można też prosić o przekład, w rozsądnych granicach.
Masterlists
Style Credit
- Base style: Modular by
- Theme: Battle Raven by
no subject
Date: 2015-10-06 23:19 (UTC)As for the theoretical possibility of the journey with no return, NASA is a public organization, they get money from the government. And, as is aptly said in the movie, they won't get financed a single paper clip anymore if they actually lose someone this way. Public opinion and all that... The movie uses the option with a series of missions (where each one leaves stuff for next ones) and... what is the opposite of lander? launcher? ...launchers send in parts and assembled on Mars. I guess there must have been also the part with making the fuel from carbon dioxide in the Martian atmosphere while waiting between missions (which requires part of the machines set off after assembling and working for some time on their own), but this part wasn't mentioned in the movie.
ETA
Oh, I forgot. The mother ship is only orbiter, of course! It never lands on Mars! Or Earth, for that matter. All the traffic between the space and surface is done by landers and, uh, launchers, if this is the proper name...